Research shows conservative attitudes toward donor identity in Brazil
The child's right to know versus the parents' right not to tell: The attitudes of couples undergoing fertility treatments towards identity-release gamete donation (Rocha, 2023)
Rocha, D. O., Melamed, R. M. M., Braga, D. P. A. F., Setti, A. S., Iaconelli Jr., A., & Borges Jr., E. (2023). The child's right to know versus the parents' right not to tell: The attitudes of couples undergoing fertility treatments towards identity-release gamete donation. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 24(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v24i3.13276
Geographic Region: Brazil
Research Question: Do couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Brazil have different perceptions of anonymous versus identity-release gamete donation compared to the general population?
Design: Online survey fielded for 3.5 months in late 2020.
Sample: Total sample size: 500 participants. 400 participants were undergoing fertility treatments. 100 participants who accessed fertility center website, but were not undergoing treatment. Of the 400 ART participants, 11.5% completed sperm donation cycles and 10% completed egg donation cycles.
Key Findings
Most participants in both groups (>80%) believed family relationships would be affected by disclosure of donor conception.
ART patients were significantly more likely to oppose donor identity disclosure (65%) compared to the general population group (51%).
Among those supporting disclosure, most preferred revealing information only if the child questions their biological origin (67%). Only about 20% supported disclosure from birth.
No significant differences were found between attitudes toward sperm versus egg donation disclosure.
Limitations: No verification of website participants' actual involvement with infertility/ART. Unable to conduct face-to-face interviews. Possible selection bias in online recruitment.
Applications: Highlights ongoing challenges in accessing genetic origin information in countries with mandatory anonymity
Funding Source: Not explicitly stated
Lead Author: Douglas Oliveira Rocha is a Researcher at Associação Instituto Sapientiae-Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Assistida in São Paulo, Brazil, focusing on attitudes and perspectives in assisted reproduction.
Regulatory Context:
Brazil maintains mandatory donor anonymity as per National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) regulations in December 2022. It requires strict confidentiality of all donor information.
The Children’s Act gives all children the right to know their genetic identity by filing a lawsuit.
I am not surprised by this. Is there research from Asia on their attitudes? What about Asian families in the west?