An exploration of psychological, emotional and social wellbeing among donor conceived young adults in the UK
Young donor-conceived adults report lower life satisfaction than peers but still score within normal wellbeing ranges
Ridley-Jones, C., Jadva, V., & Zadeh, S. (2024). An exploration of psychological, emotional and social wellbeing among donor conceived young adults in the UK [Conference presentation abstract]. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 40th Annual Meeting, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 39(Supplement_1), deae108.827. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/39/Supplement_1/deae108.827/7704388
Geographic Location: United Kingdom
Research Question: Do donor-conceived young adults differ from those not donor-conceived on key indicators of wellbeing?
Methods: Cross-sectional survey study. Anonymous online survey conducted between January-August 2022. Standardized questionnaires measuring mental health, life satisfaction, gratitude, mastery, collective self-esteem, identity confusion, and resilience. Survey was developed in consultation with community partners (Donor Conception Network and Donor Conceived Register Registrants' Panel).
Sample: 92 young adults aged 18-30 in the UK (41 donor conceived, 51 not donor conceived). Mostly female (80%) and mostly conceived from sperm donation (78%)
Analysis: Statistical comparisons between groups (t-tests, correlations)
Key Findings:
Young adults who were donor-conceived reported feeling less satisfied with their lives compared to their peers. They showed lower levels of general wellbeing, though their scores were still within normal ranges for the general population.
Donor-conceived young adults felt they had less control over their lives and their future compared to others their age.
They were less likely to feel strongly connected to their social groups, suggesting they might struggle more with group identity.
They expressed less gratitude about their life circumstances than their non-donor-conceived peers.
Less than half (44%) of the donor-conceived participants had always known about their conception status.
More than half (56%) found out later in life, with some learning as late as age 27.
Those who had always known about being donor-conceived showed more positive outcomes. They felt less stigma about their conception status. They expressed more pride in their donor-conceived identity. They generally showed better emotional adjustment.
The more stigma a person felt about being donor-conceived, the lower their general wellbeing tended to be.
Limitations: Small, self-selected sample. Lack of diversity in gender and donation type. Participants partly recruited through support organizations.
Applications:
Helping young donor-concieved people deal with stigma might be an important way to improve their overall wellbeing.
Parents should consider telling their children about their donor conception early in life, as those who always knew showed better wellbeing outcomes.
Funding Source: Not specified
Lead Author: Unable to find information
Regulatory Context:
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is the UK's independent regulator overseeing fertility treatment and research using human embryos.
In 2005, the UK changed its laws regulating gamete donation from anonymous donation to identifiable donation.
As of October 2023, donor-conceived people conceived on or after April 1, 2005, can access information about their donor's identity and request information about the identity of any donor siblings who have also expressed interest in contact at age 18.
Those conceived before the law change in 2005 do not have the same legal right to identifying information about their donors, who were guaranteed anonymity at the time of donation.
The UK has a voluntary register called the Donor Conceived Register (DCR) which allows donors and donor-conceived people from before 2005 to voluntarily register and potentially match with each other.
I wonder if different cultural groups feel more or less stigma, especially within their own ethnic communities. Considering how some cultures feel the need to hide. And how does this compare to adoptees?